Redential for business
Hire from proof,
not paper.

Invite your candidates to verify on Redential. Each completes a code audit and an audio defense, scored against their own repository. You get a private workspace of verified capability records: what they can actually build, with the proof attached.

The workspace
Your cohort, sorted by proof.
Every row is a developer who finished the audit + audio defense. Redential scores the defense against their own code — integrity flags surface the submissions that don't hold up.
redential.com/workspace
Proof of work· 50 records
50Audited
12Score > 85
8Flagged
03:51Avg defense
ScoreCandidate · Verified stackAI verdictDefense audioIntegrity
94
usr_948271_ai
PyTorchLangChain
Defense matched the repository on every probe. Candidate explained the streaming token queue and the rationale for batching at the embedding layer — both present and non-trivial in the code. Asked about a failure mode they hadn't hit; reasoned through it correctly on the spot.
03:45
Risk · Low
91
usr_771204_be
GogRPCRedis
Strong systems reasoning. Walked through the idempotency-key design for the webhook consumer and why the dedupe window is sized the way it is — Redis TTL and consumer offsets matched the explanation.
04:12
Risk · Low
88
usr_330918_fs
TypeScripttRPC
Solid full-stack defense. Explained the server-state boundary and tRPC procedure layout convincingly. Slight hesitation on cache invalidation — described the intent but not the exact trigger; the code does it via a revalidate tag.
03:20
Risk · Low
72
usr_512663_ml
PythonFastAPI
Defense was correct but shallow relative to the repo. Described what the feature pipeline does but was vague on why specific transforms were chosen. No integrity flag — likely under-explained rather than not-authored.
02:38
Risk · Medium
41
usr_204887_xx
ReactNode
Multiple probes failed. Candidate could not explain the auth middleware at the center of the submitted repo, and described an architecture that does not match the code. Commit history shows the bulk landing in two commits. Flagged for integrity review — NOT a capability score.
01:54
Plagiarism warning
What you get

Proof you can act on.

01Verified capability recordsProof of what each candidate can build — not a self-reported CV. Every skill is tied to shipped work or a defended walkthrough.
02Audio defense, scoredEach record is backed by the candidate explaining their work out loud, cross-checked against their actual repository.
03Integrity flagsSubmissions that don't match their author — copied code, two-commit projects — surface as integrity reviews, not buried in a score.
04A private workspaceYour cohort in one place, sorted by Redential score, re-audited on every push. Invite by link, review on your schedule.
05Capability, not keywordsFilter by what people proved — RAG, auth, systems — backed by evidence, not by who wrote the right words on a résumé.
06Unlimited candidatesA flat monthly subscription — verify as many candidates as you want. No per-seat licensing, no per-record fees.
How it works

From invite to proof in three steps.

01Invite your cohort

Share one link. Candidates verify with the repos they've already built — no take-home busywork.

02Redential audits + defends

Each runs a code audit and a recorded audio defense, scored against their own code.

03You review the proof

Open verified records in your workspace — capabilities, the defense audio, the integrity check.

For platforms

Integrate via API

Already have a hiring, staffing, or talent platform? Add independent developer verification to your own product with the Redential partner API.

Read the docs

See what your candidates can really build.

Set up a workspace for your team. We'll walk you through it.

Not a Hiring platform. Just credentialing.

For teams with an existing hiring, staffing, or talent platform, Redential is also available through API.